The Judicial Policy of the International Court of Justice towards Human Rights: Oscillation between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint
نویسندگان
1 Master of Public International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Paris 11
2 Professor of Public International Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University
doi
10.22034/iruns.2022.143615چکیده
The judicial policy of the International Court of Justice (ICJ or the Court) towards human rights has often oscillated between judicial activism and judicial restraint. The cause of the ICJ’s oscillation is mainly rooted in the structure of international law, which is in the stage of transition from sovereignty (raison d’Etat) to international community (raison d’humanité). The question raised is that in which range of legal issues the Court has often displayed a judicial activism or judicial restraint vis-à-vis human rights. This article will endeavour to respond to this question from a critical perspective. In doing so, we will first examine a range of legal issues such as diplomatic protection and international humanitarian law in which the Court has often displayed a judicial activism. We will then analyze a range of legal issues such as jurisdictional immunities of states as well as the Court’s jurisdiction where it has often displayed a judicial restraint.
