The Effect of Face-to-Face Education and Video Training on the Knowledge of Patients Requesting Bone Marrow Transplantation in a Teaching Hospital

نویسندگان

1 Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Clinical Research Development Unit, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

4 Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

5 Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

doi
10.34172/JHAD.92393
چکیده

AbstractBackground: Patients’ education increases their knowledge regarding their diseases, treatment, and related problems. To enhancethe effectiveness of education, it is necessary to use appropriate teaching methods. This study aimed to compare the effect of face-to-face education and video training on patients requesting bone marrow transplantation.Methods: This semi-experimental study was conducted from May 2018 to January 2019 in the bone marrow transplantationdepartment of a teaching hospital affiliated with Kerman University of Medical Sciences. A total of 68 patients were assigned totwo groups: face-to-face education and video training. Face-to-face education consisted of three 40-minute sessions a week beforetransplantation. In the video training method, the video was made available to the patient one week before admission. In bothgroups, patients’ knowledge levels were examined before and after training using a two-part questionnaire. SPSS software version18 was used to analyze the data.Results: The mean age of patients was higher in the video training group (52.47±15.15) than in the face-to-face education group.The majority of patients in both groups were men, with 55.89% in the video group and 58.82% in the face-to-face group. The meanknowledge score in both groups significantly increased after the intervention (from 3.70±0.03 to 9.38±0.04 in the video groupand from 3.52±0.04 to 9.14±0.65 in the face-to-face group) (P=0.001). However, there was no significant difference betweenthe two groups (P=0.970).Conclusion: The results of this study showed that educational interventions could increase patients’ knowledge levels. Therefore,depending on the patient’s condition, either of the training methods can be selected.