The Role of Emimate Traditions in Equivalence Findings of Quranic Words and its Reflection in the Criticism of the Contemporary Qoran's Translation
نویسندگان
1 ** Associate professor, in Quran and Hadith Sciences, the University of Isfahan.
2 M.A. graduated, in Quran and Hadith Sciences, the University of Isfahan ( Answerable Author).
doi
چکیده
In recent decades, as a result of the appearance of a number of Persian translations of the Holy Quran, the area of "the criticism of Quranic translations" has been known as one of the newly-grown areas in Quranic studies. In this case, the growing number of works including papers, books and academics these are the revealing reason of this claim. The study of such works indicates that a significant number of these works inspired by the new findings of linguistics deals with issues such as syntactic, morphological, lexical, rhetorical, stylistic and discourse criticisms, which in their own are valuable. This paper, through referring to the interpretive traditions, aims at suggesting a new approach in finding more exact equivalents for the Quranic words. In this case, five words in ten contemporary Persian translations were studied. It is obvious that in this study, referring to the general and specialized dictionaries is inevitable. In authors' belief, this approach can be revealing in translation and interpretation of Quran .
