Determinants and Interventions for Vaccine Hesitancy in Rural Communities: A Global Narrative Review of Socio-Cultural, Institutional, and Infrastructural Barriers
نویسندگان
1 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biosciences, Federal University Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria
2 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria
3 Department of Community Medicine, Federal University of Health Sciences, Azare, Bauchi State, Nigeria
4 Department: Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomosho, Nigeria
5 Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Babcock University, Ilisan-Remo Ogun State, Nigeria
6 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Nigeria
7 Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, USA
8 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Imo State University, Imo State, Nigeria
9 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Epidemiology, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, River State Nigeria
10 Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Madonna University, Okada, Edo State, Nigeria
doi
10.48309/ijabbr.2026.2065686.1634چکیده
The objective of this study is to synthesize global evidence on vaccine hesitancy determinants in rural communities and evaluate intervention strategies for improving immunization coverage in underserved populations. A comprehensive narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from January 2005 to December 2024. Search terms included "vaccine hesitancy," "rural immunization," "healthcare access," and related terms. Two independent reviewers screened 1,247 articles using predefined inclusion criteria. Studies focusing on rural or underserved communities, socio-political determinants of vaccine hesitancy, and intervention strategies were included. Thematic analysis was conducted using established vaccine hesitancy frameworks, with quality assessment performed using appropriate tools for different study designs. Rural vaccine coverage consistently lags behind urban areas globally, with disparities ranging from 18 to 25 percentage points. Five primary determinants emerged: psychological barriers (fear of adverse effects in 45% of hesitant individuals), religious and cultural beliefs (particularly influential in 23% of rural communities studied), institutional mistrust (affecting 35% of minority populations), socio-economic constraints (transport costs averaging $15-50 per vaccination visit), and misinformation exposure (reaching 67% of rural populations through social media). Evidence-based interventions showed varying effectiveness: community engagement programs (65% improvement in uptake), mobile vaccination services (40% coverage increase), and culturally tailored education (30% hesitancy reduction). Vaccine hesitancy in rural communities requires multi-level, culturally sensitive interventions addressing structural, informational, and trust-related barriers. Successful strategies integrate community leadership, improved access, transparent communication, and sustainable healthcare system reforms. Future research should prioritize randomized controlled trials of integrated intervention models and develop context-specific frameworks for diverse rural populations.
