فهرست نشریات علمی دسترسی آزاد ایران

Background and Aim: Psychological trauma includes disorders in which exposure to a traumatic event is listed as a diagnostic criterion. Trauma has a natural and material reality. Psychiatrists have recently understood its aspects and have considered a separate chapter for it. But its religious ruling has not yet been addressed. Of course, the religious ruling on cases such as loss of intellect has been stated in jurisprudence, but it is clear that traumatic disorders do not reach its level. Therefore, given the prevalence of its occurrence in crimes and the lack of the necessary jurisprudential examination, it is important to address it and analyze it jurisprudentially. Materials and Methods: The present research was conducted in a descriptive-analytical method using jurisprudential books and articles. Psychological sources were also used in the thematic analysis. Conclusion: Psychological trauma disorders are inherent (natural) conditions that is not due to physical complications and consequences of drug use. They are rooted in physiological interactions. Causing these disorders in another is commonly considered an offense and aggression against another. Therefore, according to the waste rule, the injured person has the right to retribution, and since retribution in kind is not possible, the right to pay to compensate for material or physical damage (Arsh) is proven. Also, by carefully examining the hadith of "no harm", it can be proven that any ruling or non-ruling that causes material or spiritual harm - whether this harm can be provided or not - has been removed. Since these disorders do not have a specific blood money in Sharia, according to hadiths, the Sharia judge must select two just people from among the experts to determine the blood money, and they determine it by measuring disorder with loss of intellect - which has a specific blood money - or other methods. In our society, this work is carried out by forensic experts under the order of a judicial authority.