واکاوی فقهی حقوقی دیه ترک‌برداشتن استخوان

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه امام صادق (ع) و پژوهشگر مرکز پژوهشی دانشنامه‌های حقوقی علامه، تهران، ایران. (نویسنده مسؤول)

2 استادیار مرکز پژوهشی دانشنامه‌های حقوقی علامه، تهران، ایران

doi
10.22037/mfj.v11i41-40.27581
چکیده

Background and Aim: The rule of bone fracture is one of the rules related to the bone injuries blood money, which is mentioned as an example in some jurisprudential and narrative texts. This rule was proposed firstly in paragraph (c) of Article 569 of the Islamic Penal Code adopted in 2013. In this paragraph, the legislator considers bone fracture blood money of each organ as Four-fifths of blood money of breaking that organ, while bone breaking in two states, complete recovery and incomplete recovery, has different blood money. So the question for the authors is whether the bone fracture blood money is different in the case of complete recovery and incomplete recovery? Materials and Methods: This research has been done in explaining the legal jurisprudential of the rule of bone fracture, by descriptive analytical method and referring to library sources, and in examining the judicial procedure related to determining the amount of bone fracture blood money, a survey method has been used. Conclusion: In this paper it is concluded that bone fracture blood money is a function of its treatment status and is more compatible with jurisprudential and legal principles. The contents of the unanimous vote of No. 1398/09/19-782 of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court of the country also confirm this matter