واکاوی وضعیت حجر مبتلایان به اغمای خارج از کنترل در فقه امامیه و حقوق ایران

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته فقه و مبانی حقوق، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران. (نویسنده مسؤول)

3 استادیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

doi
10.22037/mfj.v11i41-40.31022
چکیده

Background and Aim: Interdiction (Hejr) is one of the topics that jurists and lawyer have long studied its concept and jurisprudential-lega effects. Out-of-control coma or continuous anesthesia is one of the specialized topics of medical science, which encompasses various jurisprudential and legal issues. One of the new topics in Islamic jurisprudence is interdict individuals suffering from out-of-control coma. Materials and Methods: This research, which has been done by descriptive-analytical method and with the analysis of legal jurisprudential texts, investigats the status of individuals suffering from an out of control coma interdiction. Conclusion: The present study shows that people with out of control coma cannot be counted as interdicted people and subject to the support of the legislature of Public interest affairs (omoure Hasbi) law.  As a result, choosing a protecter (Ghayem) for them lacks religious and legal documentation. Therefore, it seems necessary for the legislator to establish a comprehensive protection institution to protect these people by enacting a law.