A Cohort Study in Iran: Mobile-Bearing-Versus Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are These the Same?
نویسندگان
1 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
3 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Hazrat-e-Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
5 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Hazrat-e-Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
6 Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Hazrat-e-Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
7 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
8 Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
doi
10.5812/soj.83770چکیده
Background: Application of fix-bearing-(FB) or mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an area of controversy. Introduction of mobile-bearing implants has become an appealing option for some surgeons leading to more favorable structural and weight-bearing outcomes in TKA; however, the beneficial long-term outcome is still unclear.
