Medicare Compensation Rates for Hand and Shoulder/ Elbow Surgery by Operative Time: A Comparative Analysis
نویسندگان
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
5 Curtis National Hand Center, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
6 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
doi
10.22038/abjs.2019.39965.2072چکیده
Background: There is a high demand for shoulder/elbow experience among hand-fellowship trainees due to theperception that this exposure will improve their professional “marketability” in a subspecialty they perceive as havinghigher compensation.Methods: Using Medicare data, we investigated the most common surgeries from these fields and determinedwhich have the highest compensation [work relative value unit (wRVU), payment, charge, and reimbursement(payment-to-charge percentage] rates per operative time. We then determined whether the overall non-weightedand weighted (by surgical frequency/volume) compensation rates of shoulder/elbow surgery are greater than thatof hand surgery.Results: Among 30 shoulder/elbow procedures, arthroplasty and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair had the highest paymentand wRVU assignments. Among 83 hand procedures, upper-extremity flaps, carpal stabilization, distal radius openreduction internal fixation (ORIF), both-bone ORIF, and interposition arthroplasty had the greatest wRVU assignmentswith correspondingly high payments. A non-weighted comparison of the two subspecialties showed that hand surgeryhas a higher mean payment/min ($10.46±3.22 vs. $7.52±2.89), charge/min ($51.02±17.11 vs. $41.96±11.32), andreimbursement (21±4.7% vs. 18±5.1%) compared with shoulder/elbow surgery (all, p <0.01). Non-weighted meanwRVUs/min were similar (0.12±0.03 vs. 0.13±0.03, P = 0.12). When weighted by procedure frequency, hand surgeryhad greater wRVUs/min (0.15±0.036 vs. 0.13±0.032), payments/min ($14.17±4.50 vs. $6.97±2.26), charges/min($75.68±30.47 vs. $42.61±7.83), and reimbursement (20±5.0% vs. 17±6.0%) (all, p <0.01).Conclusion: According to Medicare compensation, and when weighted by procedure frequency, hand proceduresare associated with greater overall mean wRVUs/min, payments/min, charges/min, and reimbursement compared withshoulder and elbow procedures. Hand-surgery fellowship applicants should be aware that subspecialty compensationis complex in nature but should seek shoulder/elbow elective experience to acquire an additional surgical skill-set asopposed to primarily monetary reason.Level of evidence: III
