Comparison of Two Methods of Teaching hypertension in Under Graduate Medical Students: “Planned lecture” Versus “Cooperative learning”
نویسندگان
doi
10.5812/numonthly.4103چکیده
Background: The direct and indirect negative impacts of hypertension on mortality and morbidity and the deficiencies in physicians’ knowledge on its management prompted us to search for new methods of training this item. Objectives: In this study, 2 methods of teaching—planned lecture and cooperation—were compared in instructing hypertension to medical students. Results: Fifty-one students participated in the study. The total number of students in the lecture (group 1) and cooperation (group 2) methods was 28 and 23, respectively. By independent t-test, differences in test scores indicated a similar achievement of the 2 methods for the endpoint of basic knowledge (P = 0.253). But, the cooperation method was more successful in transferring abilities, primarily in the areas of workup and treatment (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The study findings show that both methods can set in the optimal training for hypertension to students but that the cooperative method is more effective for deduction analysis.