Nifedipine Versus Magnesium Sulfate for Treatment of Preterm Labor: Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Effects in a Randomized Controlled Trial

نویسندگان
doi
10.5812/semj.46875
چکیده

Objectives: The study aimed to compare the efficacy and side effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO 4 ) and oral nifedipine for inhibition of preterm labor. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was performed on 220 women with preterm labor between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation who were randomly assigned to receive either MgSO 4 or nifedipine. The primary outcome was inhibition of preterm labor, defined as prevention of delivery for 48 hours with inhibition of uterine contraction, and the secondary outcome was maternal side effects. Results: From 220 patients, 110 received nifedipine and 110 received MgSO 4 . There were no differences in suppression of labor pain in 24 hours and 48 hours between the two groups. Also, there were not statistically significant differences in one-minute and five-minute Apgar scores, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and NICU admission between the two groups. Maternal hypotension was higher in the nifedipine group, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.08). Dyspnea (P = 0.01) and minor maternal side effects (P ≤ 0.001) were significantly higher in the MgSO 4 group than the nifedipine group. Serious maternal adverse effects and severe hypotension were not seen in any of the groups. Conclusions: Nifedipine is as effective as MgSO 4 in arresting labor and delaying delivery for 48 hours. However, nifedipine is associated with significantly fewer maternal adverse effects.