Comparative analysis of diploma and undergraduate midwifery students’ perceptions of inclusive maternity care in Indonesia, 2024–2025
نویسندگان
1 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Behavioural Science, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
2 Department of Nursing, Ministry of Health Polytechnic of Sorong, Sorong, Papua, Indonesia
3 Department of Doctoral Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia AND Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
4 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Behavioural Science, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
5 Department of Nursing, Ministry of Health Polytechnic of Sorong, Sorong, Papua, Indonesia
doi
10.48307/nms.2025.512623.1588چکیده
Background: Inclusive maternity care is critical for achieving equitable health outcomes, particularly in remote regions where access and cultural barriers persist. Midwifery education plays a central role in preparing students to deliver such care; however, comparative evidence between diploma and undergraduate programs in Indonesia remains limited.Objectives: This study aimed to compare final-year diploma and undergraduate midwifery students’ perceptions of inclusive maternity care in Southwest Papua.Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between June 2024 and January 2025 among 143 students (68 diploma, 75 undergraduate) selected via stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire that assessed inclusivity across six domains: accessibility, equality and non-discrimination, respect and dignity in care, effective communication, patient-centred care, and cross-sectoral collaboration. Data were analyzed with independent t-tests and chi-square tests.Results: Undergraduate students demonstrated significantly higher scores in understanding (mean 4.2 vs. 3.8, P=0.02) and preparedness (mean 4.0 vs. 3.7, P=0.04) for inclusive care, whereas diploma students more frequently reported limited hands-on training as a primary barrier (73.5% vs. 60.0%, P=0.04). No significant differences were observed across the six domains, though both groups identified communication -particularly with patients with disabilities- as the weakest aspect, with agreement rates of 62.7% (undergraduate) and 55.9% (diploma).Conclusion: Educational level influences students’ readiness but does not significantly affect overall attitudes toward inclusivity. Enhancing practical exposure, disability-sensitive communication skills, and institutional support is essential to translating inclusive maternity care policies into practice in Indonesia’s underserved regions.